If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone. These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users. A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to health. The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue. Since what is a safe distance from a cell tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer. Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it. Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas. However, Helpful hints showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues. This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating). The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards. Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. https://anotepad.com/notes/7dymgdtx of RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower|Helpful hints|https://anotepad.com/notes/7dymgdtx
